拍摄着火的人是否该受到谴责用英语写观点

Recently, a entitled "fire shoot crude 42 seconds of video in the network of heat transfer, video display, a residential floor burst fire, building man is pushed to the fire a window anti-theft window and cried loudly for help. After the Guangdong fire administrative micro-blog update five for micro-blog, "strongly criticised by" and the video shoot. It is understood that the fire occurred in April 14th in Huadu District, Guangzhou, the man was killed in a call for help.

Information age, everyone may act as a media reporter, when an emergency, but also faced with the record or rushed up, the choice. For professional journalists and professional photographers, the industry tends to have a "first person, followed by the record person". Speaking of this, many people will think of "vultures and African children" event. No doubt, if the photographer had the ability to engage in humanitarian relief, it is time to put down the camera or phone to save.

Guangzhou this 42 seconds cruel shooting, whether it should be condemned, the key depends on whether the photographer has the ability to rescue the problem. If it is able to alarm, or the conditions of the trapped were pulled out, or can be put on a ladder watering...... He is not to do, should be despised. If he did the duty of the police, other things can not do, standing on the side of the shooting record a public event, that or belong to the "neutral" behavior.

@ Guangdong fire anger lies, the photographer will be trapped last cry of struggle does not deal with public dissemination of audio and video. In the fire, the person who is trapped in the last moment of life, involving the rights of personal dignity, but also related to the feelings of the family. Public dissemination of brutal terrorist audio and video, but also against the public media order. In this view, it is clear that the communicators should learn to identify the reasonable legal limits on the issue of information dissemination.

日前，一段题为《火灾拍摄者残忍42秒》的视频在网络热传，视频显示，一户居民楼突发大火，楼内男子被大火逼到一个外窗防盗窗上，哭喊着大声呼救。之后广东消防官微一连更新五条微博，“强烈唾弃”和发文谴责视频拍摄者。据了解，火灾4月14日发生在广州花都区，呼救男子最终丧生。

信息时代，人人都可能充当自媒体“记者”，发生紧急事件时，也都面临“记录或冲上去”的抉择。对于专业记者与职业摄影师，业界往往有“首先是人，其次是记录者”的说法。说到这，很多人会想到《秃鹰和非洲儿童》事件。无疑，若拍摄者当时有能力搞人道救助，就该先放下摄影机或手机去救人。

广州这个“42秒残忍拍摄”，是否该受到谴责，关键还要看拍摄者是否有能力救援的问题。若其能报警，或有条件将被困者拉出来，或能浇水能递上一部梯子……他都不去做，理应受唾弃。如果他尽到了报警义务，其他事做不了，站在一边拍摄记录一场公***事件，那或属于“中性”行为。

@广东消防的愤怒还在于，拍摄者将被困者最后的哭嚎挣扎的音像不作处理地公开传播。火灾中被困者生命最后一刻的镜头，涉及个人尊严权利，还涉及家属感情。公开传播残酷恐怖音像，也是对公***媒介秩序的侵害。就此看，传播者显然应学会甄别信息传播问题上的合理合法界限。